Summer Moon-Utah Wells

Summer Moon-Utah Wells

Forensic Pattern Review of a Child’s Disappearance

Intro

This post provides a forensic pattern analysis of the disappearance of Summer Moon-Utah Wells. These findings are based on structured chart data modeling and are intended for investigative and educational discussion only. All individuals referenced are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Case Overview

Five-year-old Summer Wells was reported missing from her home in Rogersville, Tennessee, on June 15, 2021. Her last confirmed sighting was around 2:30 PM, and despite national media attention and extensive search efforts, she remains missing as of this writing.

This analysis examines the critical timing, behavioral patterns, and environmental dynamics present at the time of her disappearance.

Key Findings

1. Timeline Suggests Loss of Consciousness by 3:09 PM
Based on timing markers in the chart, Summer was likely deceased or unconscious by approximately 3:09 PM, indicating a very narrow window between her last reported sighting and the moment she vanished from sight.

2. The Swimming Incident Was Real—and Relevant
The chart supports that the swimming event earlier in the day was not fabricated. However, it may have played a more serious role in her condition, potentially impacting her physical or emotional state prior to the disappearance.

3. Signs of Abuse Within the Home Environment
Behavioral indicators suggest patterns consistent with both physical and sexual abuse, most likely occurring within the household. These findings point to an ongoing issue rather than a one-time event.

4. Possible Introduction of Substances
The chart contains signatures that imply the presence of alcohol or other substances in the environment—and raises the possibility that Summer may have been exposed to them directly.

5. Multiple Adults Are Implicated
Patterns suggest the involvement of more than one adult—not necessarily in the act itself, but in either witnessing, enabling, or covering up what happened to Summer. The concealment appears coordinated, not accidental.

Conclusion

The forensic pattern does not support the theory of a stranger abduction. Instead, the evidence suggests Summer's disappearance was the result of events that occurred inside her home or within her immediate surroundings. Key behavioral markers point to trauma, secrecy, and a deliberate effort to suppress the truth—potentially involving multiple adults.

While this review cannot assign legal responsibility, it raises urgent questions about what took place in the hours leading up to Summer’s disappearance—and who may still be protecting the truth.

Disclaimer

This post is based on forensic pattern analysis and timeline modeling. It is not legal evidence and should not be interpreted as such. All individuals mentioned or implied are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Previous
Previous

Idaho 4

Next
Next

Karen Read